From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alexis" Subject: Re: opening connection for Tomcat Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:50:04 -0300 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <002b01c41e39$906eb4c0$51a2fea9@heretic> References: <40756C19.3010606@tin.it> <1081446600.2453.63.camel@katala.sterenborg.info> <4075B24D.1020601@tin.it> <200404082253.44301.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> <407642A3.1040700@tin.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Gianni Pucciani Cc: netfilter using the correct mask it is. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gianni Pucciani" To: "Netfilter" Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 3:28 AM Subject: Re: opening connection for Tomcat > Antony Stone wrote: > > On Thursday 08 April 2004 9:13 pm, Gianni Pucciani wrote: > > > > > >>Ok, I've fixed the problem: it seems that the address 0.0.0.0 is no good. > > > > > > You are certainly very unlikely to receive packets from that address, as it > > does not exist. > > Well, I'm not a firewall guru, but I think that 0.0.0.0 address is often > used to indicate "every address", isn't it? > > Gianni > > > > Regards, > > > > Antony. > > > > > >