Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Július Bemš" <julo@atknet.sk>
To: "'John A. Sullivan III'" <jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: adding rules - slow
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:24:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <002f01c7d40c$fb1b87d0$f1529770$@sk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1185572284.10031.2.camel@localhost>

Thank you very much ... good idea.
But do you know why is iptables so slow? Because I think about writing my own utility for adding new rules.

-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org [mailto:netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org] On Behalf Of John A. Sullivan III
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 11:38 PM
To: Július Bemš
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: adding rules - slow

On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 23:30 +0200, Július Bemš wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> When I need to add som rules (in my case 100) to some chain it takes various
> time, depending on the number of existing rules in the chain. So when I add
> 100 rules to empty chain, it takes 1.8sec. If tehere is 1000 rules int the
> chain, it takes 4.5sec and if there is 10000 rules it takes 21sec. 
> 
> My problem is, that i need to add this rules to chain which contains 20000
> rules in short time. I think, that the way of adding rules into chain is
> very innefective. 
> 
> Could someone tell me how the adding works internally? What data structures
> are used? Because I need solve this and find the way how to add new rules
> quickly.
> 
> Thanks for replies
> 
> 
We face the same problem on the ISCS project
(http://iscs.sourceforge.net).  There, do to micro-perimeter network
security, we frequently generate thousands or tens of thousands of rules
with the click of a mouse.

We handle it by adding rules via iptables-restore rather than iptables.
The load time difference is remarkable.  You write your rules into files
with very similar syntax to iptables and then direct them into
iptables-restore, e.g., 

iptables-restore < /etc/PEP/rules.txt

or, if you do not want to overwrite existing rules,

iptables-restore -n < /etc/PEP/runtimerules.txt

Hope this helps - John
-- 
John A. Sullivan III
Open Source Development Corporation
+1 207-985-7880
jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com

Financially sustainable open source development
http://www.opensourcedevel.com





  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-01  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-27 21:30 adding rules - slow Július Bemš
2007-07-27 21:38 ` John A. Sullivan III
2007-07-27 22:31   ` Tom Eastep
2007-08-01  7:24   ` Július Bemš [this message]
2007-08-01  7:29     ` Eric Leblond
2007-08-01  7:40     ` Покотиленко Костик

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='002f01c7d40c$fb1b87d0$f1529770$@sk' \
    --to=julo@atknet.sk \
    --cc=jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox