Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Barry A Rich" <barich@trisectrix.com>
To: 'Grant Taylor' <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>,
	'Mail List - Netfilter' <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: UDP stream load balancing across multiple uplinks
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:36:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <003201c8ef67$aed713e0$0c853ba0$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4889ECB9.3090206@riverviewtech.net>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of Grant Taylor
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 11:10 AM
> 
> Given that the source IP of your packets can change mid stream, you
> could use the "nth" match extension.  Using "nth" you would match
> packets to decide how to mark them and then use the mark to determine
> what routing table to use which would ultimately decide which outbound
> path to use.

The nth match looks promising. Given that I want to avoid connection
tracking, I tried the following commands:

iptables -t raw -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p udp --sport $SPORT -m statistic
--mode nth --every 3 --packet 0 -j SNAT --to-source $UPLINK1IP
iptables -t raw -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p udp --sport $SPORT -m statistic
--mode nth --every 3 --packet 1 -j SNAT --to-source $UPLINK2IP
iptables -t raw -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p udp --sport $SPORT -m statistic
--mode nth --every 3 --packet 2 -j SNAT --to-source $UPLINK3IP

Each of these produce the following error:

	iptables: Invalid argument

Any suggestions on what is wrong? Is this the correct way to bypass
connection tracking?

Thanks.



  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-26 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-25  1:23 UDP stream load balancing across multiple uplinks Barry A Rich
     [not found] ` <a43edf1b0807241837n7e6dceb4id5a16dd56c6344a9@mail.gmail.com>
2008-07-25 14:19   ` Barry A Rich
2008-07-25 15:09     ` Grant Taylor
2008-07-26 21:36       ` Barry A Rich [this message]
2008-07-28 13:33       ` Barry A Rich
2008-08-04  7:26         ` Покотиленко Костик
2008-08-04 13:57           ` Barry A Rich
2008-08-04 14:41             ` Покотиленко Костик
2008-08-04 15:48               ` Barry A Rich
2008-08-04 17:46                 ` Покотиленко Костик
     [not found]   ` <000001c8ee59$6e86fee0$4b94fca0$@com>
     [not found]     ` <a43edf1b0807250755s32268b93mcd3227a7f364203b@mail.gmail.com>
2008-07-25 15:10       ` Barry A Rich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='003201c8ef67$aed713e0$0c853ba0$@com' \
    --to=barich@trisectrix.com \
    --cc=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox