From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Big Daddy" <bigdaddy@monster-solutions.net>
Subject: Re: HTTP Port forwarding issues
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:03:50 -0400
Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org
Message-ID: <003501c226ba$93cc7da0$6702a8c0@internal.monstersolutions.net>
References: <001f01c226b6$eb0a4f60$6702a8c0@internal.monstersolutions.net> <3D29EB93.9080109@shorewall.net> <000d01c226b8$eb7b9ce0$6702a8c0@internal.monstersolutions.net> <20020708195715.CBTA19225.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@there>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org>
Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/netfilter/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>, netfilter@lists.samba.org

i have the following rule as well.

iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Antony Stone" <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
To: <netfilter@lists.samba.org>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: HTTP Port forwarding issues


> On Monday 08 July 2002 8:51 pm, Big Daddy wrote:
> 
> > It worked when I was using a Linksys router. However maybe they have
> > changed it since then. Do my rules look fine?
> 
> Well, I hope these are not your *only* rules ?   I mean, like Stewart 
> suggested, what about the ESTABLISHED packets as well as the NEW ones ?
> 
>  
> 
> Antony.
>