From: "Marius Mertens" <marius.mertens@gmx.de>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Packets that should have been DNATted appearing in INPUT table
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:43:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003601c4f51b$22c36790$4206a8c0@loki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 41DEEC58.2020504@utilitran.com
On Friday, January 07, 2005 9:08 PM,
Michael Gale wrote:
> I believe you are misunderstanding what is happening, your rule:
>
> iptables -A INPUT -i ppp0 -p tcp --dport 4664 -j DROP
>
> Should not affect packets you are forwarding, because those packets
> from outside that are being sent to a internal machine should be
> matched against the FORWARD and not the INPUT.
Yes, this is exactly my problem: As you said, forwarded packets should never
be matched against rules in INPUT. And thats where the DROP rule above
enters the game: I just inserted it as a very primitive "test", just to have
a packet counter for packets matching criteria "-i ppp0 -p tcp --dport 4664"
in INPUT and expected it to be constantly zero. The only purpose of this
drop rule is to show me, how many packets (matching the same criteria "-i
ppp0 -p tcp --dport 4664") have not been DNATed in PREROUTING.
> So some where packets are not matching the PREROUTING rule, either you
> have a rule above that is causing some packets to be accept before
> they reach the PREROUTING rule.
Again, I fully agree: Something made some of the packets not match the DNAT
rule in PREROUTING, otherwise INPUT would never have seen them. I hope you
can see anything abnormal with my rules, because I am really stuck with that
problem.
> You could to a iptables -t nat -vnL and iptables -vnL and provide the
> out put. Plus if you are running test where are you running them from
> ?
Please see the complete output below. The "test" I do is no active testing.
I just run the application (which communicates with machines on the
internet, outside my LAN) on the box in my LAN the router should DNAT to and
monitor the packet counters of the rules I added for diagnostic purpose. I
am sure you already have noticed, but as my english is not that good, I
would now like to let the rules talk for themselves ;-)
Just one final comment: I temporarily "tidied up" (yes, I know that this
setup doesn't make sense for a productive system ;-)) my ruleset in order
not to flood this list with unnecessary stuff (my actual ruleset is rather
looooong and the things I removed are irrelevant for the problem, but please
see for yourself). I fear it will get ugly enough, because of that automatic
linebreak ;-)
Thanks for your patience,
Marius
Output of iptables -vnL
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
4 420 ACCEPT all -- lo * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0
789 925K DROP tcp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:4664
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:22
347 30488 ACCEPT tcp -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:22
3 194 ACCEPT udp -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:53
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:53
2 656 ACCEPT udp -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:67
0 0 ACCEPT udp -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:123
10 924 ACCEPT udp -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:137
10 2401 ACCEPT udp -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:138
25 3098 ACCEPT tcp -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:139
16 2287 ACCEPT tcp -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:445
428 20960 DROP tcp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x16/0x02
63 5744 ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
1 60 ACCEPT all -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0
123 17315 DROP all -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 292K packets, 138M bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 462 packets, 39562 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
4 420 ACCEPT all -- * lo 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0
Output of iptables -t nat -vnL
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 5765 packets, 288K bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
0 0 DNAT tcp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:1070 to:192.168.6.66
0 0 DNAT tcp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:6112 to:192.168.6.66
0 0 DNAT tcp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:38930 to:192.168.6.66
2166 116K DNAT tcp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:4664 to:192.168.6.10
1505 72854 DNAT udp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:9053 to:192.168.6.10
0 0 DNAT tcp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:6881 to:192.168.6.10
0 0 DNAT tcp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:4884 to:192.168.6.10
0 0 DNAT udp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:6886 to:192.168.6.10
0 0 DNAT tcp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:4663 to:192.168.6.11
0 0 DNAT udp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:6052 to:192.168.6.11
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3709 packets, 193K bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
5283 252K MASQUERADE all -- * ppp0 192.168.6.0/24
0.0.0.0/0
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-08 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-05 18:00 Packets that should have been DNATted appearing in INPUT table Marius Mertens
2005-01-06 15:55 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-01-06 16:49 ` Marius Mertens
2005-01-07 20:08 ` Michael Gale
2005-01-08 0:43 ` Marius Mertens [this message]
2005-01-11 0:27 ` R. DuFresne
2005-01-11 15:03 ` Marius Mertens
2005-01-11 16:29 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-01-11 18:15 ` Marius Mertens
2005-01-11 18:16 ` R. DuFresne
2005-01-11 18:33 ` Marius Mertens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003601c4f51b$22c36790$4206a8c0@loki' \
--to=marius.mertens@gmx.de \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox