Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jee J.Z." <jz105@york.ac.uk>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: chains in the same table
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 15:01:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <004601c4343b$da3a38a0$68892090@grouse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 16539.37073.149335.706385@saint.heaven.net

Hi Daniel, Antony and Dick,

You are quite right. I got things wrong and I understand now. Thank you for
your explainations.

Regards,
Jee

> Jee J.Z. writes:
> > I put the following rules on the PC2:
> >
> > iptables -F
> > iptables -F -t nat
> > iptables -I FORWARD -j QUEUE
> > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to global_ip_2
> > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2
> >
> > echo '1' >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> >
> > Since I didn't put in the rules like "iptables -P INPUT DROP" and
> > "iptables -P OUTPUT DROP", I expect traffics that addressed to PC2 will
not
> > be passed on to the FORWARD chain, and therefore they will not be queued
to
> > userspace. However, it seems not the case. When I ftp or ping from PC1
to
> > PC2 (addressed to PC2), all the packets are queued to userspace and if
> > accepted from userspace are then DNATed to PC3. Could you explain this
to
> > me? Or am I missing something obvious?
>
> You have the order wrong.  Of the tables you add rules to, your packet
> hits the nat PREROUTING chain first.  In that chain your packet to PC2
> gets DNAT'd to 192.168.0.2 and is then no longer a packet to PC2, so
> routing sends it to the FORWARD chain.
>
> A way to help avoid mistakes is to fill tables in the order in which
> packets see them:
>
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2
> (routing happens here)
> iptables -I FORWARD -j QUEUE
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to global_ip_2
>
> These rules unconditionally DNAT all packets to 192.168.0.2, so they
> all go to the FORWARD chain and your QUEUE.  You can avoid having
> packets sent to PC2 from reaching your QUEUE simply by selecting
> against them in your DNAT rule:
>
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 ! -d global_ip_2 -j DNAT --to
192.168.0.2
>
> Then packets to PC2 will remain packets to PC2 and routing will send
> them to the INPUT chain rather than the FORWARD chain.
>
> --
> Dick St.Peters, stpeters@NetHeaven.com
>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-07 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-06  9:48 chains in the same table Jee J.Z.
2004-05-06 10:22 ` Klemen Kecman
2004-05-06 10:47 ` Antony Stone
2004-05-06 22:55   ` Jee J.Z.
2004-05-06 23:07     ` Antony Stone
     [not found]     ` <16539.37073.149335.706385@saint.heaven.net>
2004-05-07 14:01       ` Jee J.Z. [this message]
2004-05-06 10:50 ` Frank Gruellich
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-06 23:10 Daniel Chemko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='004601c4343b$da3a38a0$68892090@grouse' \
    --to=jz105@york.ac.uk \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox