From: <bigman@monster-solutions.net>
To: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>,
netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: DHCRELAY through IPTABLES Firewall
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 06:44:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004801c27f40$9b1ed9c0$8f33e40f@lsmith5953> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200210291030.g9TAU5e09742@vulcan.rissington.net
i have removed the DNAT rule and started DHCRELAY -i eth2 192.168.1.70 and
rebooted the system that was able to get an IP via DHCP with the DNAT rule
and it was not successful after the reboot. For some reason after DHCRELAY
gets the request and tries to forward to the DHCP server it is not making
it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Antony Stone" <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 5:29 AM
Subject: Re: DHCRELAY through IPTABLES Firewall
> On Tuesday 29 October 2002 10:02 am, bigman@monster-solutions.net wrote:
>
> > and I have also looked into this further by putting a sniffer on my DHCP
> > server. I see the request come in from the system that is getting an IP
> > successfully, but I never see a request from the system that is failing.
> > Both systems are on the same subnet so they should be using the same
> > netfilter rules.
>
> Would I be right in guessing that the system which works already has a
DHCP
> address, and is either renewing it (before its lease runs out) or is
> requesting the same address again (after the lease has run out), whereas
the
> system which fails has never had a DHCP address and is trying to get one
for
> the first time ?
>
> Antony.
>
> --
>
> If the human brain were so simple that we could understand it,
> we'd be so simple that we couldn't.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-29 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-27 4:33 DHCRELAY through IPTABLES Firewall bigman
2002-10-27 8:09 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-27 8:58 ` bigman
2002-10-28 8:49 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-28 10:36 ` bigman
2002-10-28 10:54 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-28 11:26 ` bigman
2002-10-28 11:39 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-29 7:37 ` bigman
2002-10-29 9:15 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-29 11:20 ` bigman
2002-10-29 13:03 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-30 0:30 ` bigman
2002-10-30 0:41 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-30 7:15 ` bigman
2002-10-29 10:02 ` bigman
2002-10-29 10:29 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-29 11:44 ` bigman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='004801c27f40$9b1ed9c0$8f33e40f@lsmith5953' \
--to=bigman@monster-solutions.net \
--cc=Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox