From: "Ranjeet Shetye" <ranjeet.shetye@zultys.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: unknown arg --syn
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:35:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <005c01c2b28d$bf441c40$0100a8c0@zultys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <011e01c2b24a$f7b2a800$13fcc5cb@Housecall>
Don’t use iptables 1.2.7. The NetFilter team released a 1.2.7a version
cos 1.2.7 introduced some serious bugs.
Ranjeet Shetye
Senior Software Engineer
Zultys Technologies
771 Vaqueros Avenue
Sunnyvale CA 94085
USA
Ranjeet.Shetye@Zultys.com
http://www.zultys.com/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
> [mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org] On Behalf Of hare ram
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:38 AM
> To: Keith Mastin; netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Subject: Re: unknown arg --syn
>
>
> Hi
>
> iam using redhat 8.0
> better u upgrate Iptables to 1.2.7
> its works fine
>
> hare
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Keith Mastin" <kmastin@beechtree.ca>
> To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 5:07 AM
> Subject: unknown arg --syn
>
>
> > This should be so simple, yet it's eluding me... a simple iptables
> > script on a protected machine, with a few rules where the
> syn flag is
> > set returns an error:
> >
> > rule example (lives all on one line in script):
> > iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 192.168.0.167/32
> --destination-port 22
> > --syn -j ACCEPT
> >
> > the error when the script is run:
> > [root@spy root]# sh ./iptables-rules
> > iptables v1.2.5: Unknown arg `--syn'
> > Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
> >
> > sure enough, no mention of --syn in iptables -h
> >
> > from man iptables:
> > [!] --syn
> > Only match TCP packets with the SYN bit set and the ACK
> and FIN bits
> > cleared. Such packets are used to request TCP connection
> > initiation; for example, blocking such packets coming in an
> > interface will prevent incoming TCP connections, but outgoing TCP
> > connections will be unaffected. It is equivalent to --tcp-flags
> > SYN,RST,ACK SYN. If the "!" flag precedes the "--syn",
> the sense
> > of the option is inverted.
> >
> > I also replaced --syn with --tcp-flags SYN,RST,ACK SYN,
> which resulted
> > in the error: [root@spy root]# sh ./iptables-rules
> > iptables v1.2.5: Unknown arg `--tcp-flags'
> > Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
> >
> > I think I'm too close to see the solution, so if anybody can see it
> > right off, it would be much appreciated...
> >
> > System info:
> > Redhat 7.3
> > kernel-2.4.18-19.7.x.athlon
> >
> > Also tried on another system with similar results:
> > Redhat 7.3
> > kernel-2.4.18-3smp
> >
> > TIA
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-02 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-31 23:37 unknown arg --syn Keith Mastin
2003-01-02 9:23 ` Dharmendra.T
2003-01-02 10:37 ` hare ram
2003-01-02 18:35 ` Ranjeet Shetye [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='005c01c2b28d$bf441c40$0100a8c0@zultys.com' \
--to=ranjeet.shetye@zultys.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox