Re: Is this firewall issue

["Sundaram Ramasamy" <sun@percipia.com>]

This is what I have in the mail header. He send it Oct 31st but we received
November 3rd.

Thanks for your help
-Sundaram

content-class: urn:content-classes:message

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Subject: RE: Upgrade Requirements

Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:22:35 -0500

Message-ID:

<F39DC9ED31373244ACA87544CF8E746E019BE3D7@ACCLUST01EVS1.ugd.att.com>

X-MS-Has-Attach:

X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:

Thread-Topic: Upgrade Requirements

Thread-Index: AcKBIdduSxf/BqVbTYioGqTNVZYVxgACbTzw

From: "Roy, Partha, CSCIO" <partharoy@att.com>

To: "Balkee Balakrishnan" <balkee@percipia.com>

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.percipia.com id

gA3Gvk4O028334

X-UIDL: /'c"!WYh!!@VJ!!DK1!!





----- Original Message -----
From: "Antony Stone" <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: Is this firewall issue


> On Tuesday 05 November 2002 1:45 pm, Sundaram Ramasamy wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have NATed mail server in my office, sometime users are getting  six,
> > seven days old mail, some mails they getting towice, is this because of
> > firewall or some other issue?.
>
> This is very unlikely to be a firewall problem.
>
> What do the headers of the emails say ?   Where is the excessive delay
> occurring ?
>
> Antony.
>
> --
>
> It is also possible that putting the birds in a laboratory setting
> inadvertently renders them relatively incompetent.
>
>  - Daniel C Dennett
>