From: "Ralf Schwarzmaier" <ralf@eazyraider.de>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: only the first FORWARD rule is matching
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:28:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <006f01cff1e9$e8e269a0$baa73ce0$@eazyraider.de> (raw)
Hello,
I'm stuck with a problem regarding two most identical iptables rules, except
the IP and UDP Port.
What I'm trying to do:
My linux box is receiving Packets on two different UDP Ports at eth0
(192.168.1.0/24) and I'm trying to forward those packets to different hosts
in the network connected to eth1 (192.168.245.0/24).
The Problem:
Only the first added iptables FORWARD rule is working.
root@thebox:~# iptables -I FORWARD -i eth0 -p udp --dport 20044 -j ACCEPT
If I add the second rule, it gets completely ignored.
root@thebox:~# iptables -I FORWARD -i eth0 -p udp --dport 20048 -j ACCEPT
And iptables confirms this in the packet statistics.
root@thebox:~# iptables -L -v -n
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 9523 packets, 11M bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
Chain FORWARD (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
0 0 ACCEPT udp -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:20048
27858 32M ACCEPT udp -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:20044
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 219 packets, 80793 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
The interesting fakt is, that if I delete the rules and add them in reverse
order, the other rule is working.
Just to go for sure, here is a snipped of the tcpdump output where you can
see the packets arriving at the box on eth0.
root@thebox:~# tcpdump -n -i eth0 udp
[ 1601.022974] device eth0 entered promiscuous mode
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
07:31:04.589742 IP 192.168.1.5.514 > 192.168.1.1.514: SYSLOG kernel.info,
length: 62
07:31:04.611714 IP 192.168.1.1.10038 > 192.168.1.5.20044: UDP, length 1408
07:31:04.611843 IP 192.168.1.1.10038 > 192.168.1.5.20048: UDP, length 1408
07:31:04.612004 IP 192.168.1.1.10038 > 192.168.1.5.20044: UDP, length 1374
07:31:04.612124 IP 192.168.1.1.10038 > 192.168.1.5.20048: UDP, length 1374
07:31:04.621323 IP 192.168.1.1.10038 > 192.168.1.5.20044: UDP, length 456
07:31:04.621374 IP 192.168.1.1.10038 > 192.168.1.5.20048: UDP, length 456
07:31:04.651705 IP 192.168.1.1.10038 > 192.168.1.5.20044: UDP, length 1378
07:31:04.651816 IP 192.168.1.1.10038 > 192.168.1.5.20048: UDP, length 1378
Maybe the sourceport of the packets is reason for this strange behaviour.
Versioninformations:
iptables v1.4.14
kernel 3.4.4
Does anybody an idea to get my problem solved, or even the reason for?
I really appreciate any help you can provide to solve the problem.
Ralf Schwarzmaier
next reply other threads:[~2014-10-27 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-27 13:28 Ralf Schwarzmaier [this message]
2014-10-28 4:38 ` only the first FORWARD rule is matching Akshat Kakkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='006f01cff1e9$e8e269a0$baa73ce0$@eazyraider.de' \
--to=ralf@eazyraider.de \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox