From: "Klemen Kecman" <klemen@sting.si>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: IPTABLES + IPROUTE2
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:53:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <008601c3e3e1$94d6aeb0$6a02a8c0@klemen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EHENIKBEJAMHPLPJOJBPCEDKDIAA.lucho@galix.com
$IPT -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx --dport 53 -j
DNAT --to-destination xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:53
It will forward the packet as it is to the destination ip and port. If u
have to change the packet what so ever then mangle it.
Klemen Kecman
----- Original Message -----
From: "L.Malinov" <lucho@galix.com>
To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 12:44 PM
Subject: IPTABLES + IPROUTE2
> Hi there,
>
> I have the following configuration: Local Net with Linux RedHat 9.0 Squid
> proxy server (with one net card) and 2 gateways - router1 and router2. The
> default gateway for everyone including the proxy is router1. I'd like, the
> http request from the local net sent to the proxy to be forwarded to the
> Internet via router2. I'm trying the following configuration:
>
> iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -t mangle -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark
2
> echo 202 www.out >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables
> ip rule add fwmark 2 table www.out
> ip route add default via router2 dev eth0 table www.out
>
> It looks like the packets go through the right chain under iptables and
get
> marked, however after that they still don't get forwarded via router2 but
> router1. What could be wrong in this config and is this possible to
achieve
> at all with the above configuration?
>
> Regards
>
> L.Malinov
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-26 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-23 11:44 IPTABLES + IPROUTE2 L.Malinov
2004-01-23 23:51 ` Antony Stone
2004-01-24 1:04 ` Ramin Dousti
2004-01-24 12:05 ` L.Malinov
2004-01-26 7:53 ` Klemen Kecman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-24 12:57 L.Malinov
2004-01-24 14:54 ` Antony Stone
2004-01-30 9:39 L.Malinov
2004-01-30 10:50 ` Ray Leach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='008601c3e3e1$94d6aeb0$6a02a8c0@klemen' \
--to=klemen@sting.si \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox