From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ming-Ching Tiew" Subject: patch-o-matic and modules Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:27:36 +0800 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <00a701c40b38$eb8591d0$0100a8c0@newlife> References: <20040315041348.GT26800@samad.com.au> <200403150733.07149.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org I have a question about kernel and patch-o-matic. Assuming that I have a kernel 'vmlinuz' before applying patch-o-matic. Then I go ahead to apply patch-o-matic patches, a few I have applied, say TTL and CONNMARK. Then I go ahead to recompile a new kernel but those new netfilter features I specify them as modules. Then I compile the new modules. In this example, I would get ipt_TTL.o and ipt_CONNMARK.o as result. My question is what is the impact of using this ipt_CONNMARK.o or ipt_TTL.o with the kernel 'vmlinuz' prior to applying patch-o-matic ? I tried loading it, it does not seem to have any problem. I got loaded. There is also no error in the iptables commands. It is safe to using the new modules with the old kernel ? Or must I only use it with the new kernel ?