From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jet" Subject: Re: ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 10:02:37 +0800 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <00ad01c2814a$c107c4b0$0bc8c80a@dolphin> References: <200210311225.47844.mail@vickysh.wlink.com.np> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: mail@vickysh.wlink.com.np, Maciej Soltysiak Cc: netfilter@lists.samba.org No I guess the maximum value is 64K. Yes. It did crash my machine. Just FYI, I tried this before on my 64M RAM linux box. The default is 4K connection max. But I tried to increase it to 64K. End up when the number of connections grow to 13K (based on /proc/net/ip_conntrack), it first starts killing my other processes including klogd, syslog-ng, snort. At this time, you can see the kernel start killing the process from your syslog (before syslog died) After a while my linux box hang. And wait for reboot I guess this is related to OOM (out-of-memory) bug in the kernel (I'm using 2.4.18-xfs). .//Jet > > If I increase the value what negative effect does it have??? Can I increase it > to say 3276800 ???? Hope It doesnot crash my machine. > >