From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "R. Sterenborg" Subject: Re: Unable to apply pptp patch Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 11:34:14 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <00df01c22274$cbb59160$153fa8c0@hslbrabantzuid.nl> References: <200FAA488DE0D41194F10010B597610D2BA1F6@JUPITER> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.samba.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Vieira" > Yes limitation is to all versions and it's not a netfilter problem.. it's Thanks for telling me... I was going to try it today. > Also PPTP isn't the best VPN but is widely used due to the Micro$oft support > for it.. > I know PPTP is crappy compared to a real VPN but we have Windows clients and I have to support Windows 98, NT4 and 2000 for wich, at the time, I didn't find a VPN client. Also my collegue (semi-boss) didn't want a Linux PPTP server because he cannot administer it, so I'm stuck with it (yet) ;-/ It's been a while since I searched ; is there a real VPN client and server for Windows 9x/NT4/2000 ? Since PPTP is obviously going to be a problem in the future, we will have to have an alternative, heheh.. Even if that means we're going to have a Linux VPN server. > I'd rather use IPSEC if I can only just compile my damn kernel right for > once.. (it's been a while).. > Haven't *really* looked into that yet. Can I use it with older Windows clients ? If so, I could try that too. Rob