From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Daniel_El=EDas_Robles?= Subject: Re: The posting of HTML format messages to this List!!!! Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 07:40:09 -0500 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <00ff01c21145$1fece670$45452040@robles> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00FC_01C2111B.3643FE10" Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Netfilter This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00FC_01C2111B.3643FE10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable unsubscribing from the list until this thread is over ( one more time)=20 Can we finish this once for all? Will try back in three weeks Daniel ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "rpjday" To: "Jesse W. Asher" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:27 AM Subject: Re: The posting of HTML format messages to this List!!!! > On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Jesse W. Asher wrote: >=20 > > And why should people continue to use an older paradigm rather than=20 > > using a newer one?=20 >=20 > because the older one works just fine, thanks. >=20 > > Are you suggesting that perhaps we should all go=20 > > back to using ASCII editors instead of word processors? >=20 > you should use the correct tool for the job and, in many cases, > having information in plain ASCII is a much more sensible decision. > >=20 > > My response to this is instead of asking everyone else to limit=20 > > themselves perhaps you should either upgrade your mail reader to one = > > that handles HTML or come to the conclusion that the rest of the = world=20 > > would prefer to live in a richer email environment and learn to live = > > with it. >=20 > and my response to this is that you are a thoroughly inconsiderate > unthinking buffoon, who feels that the rest of the world should > accommodate itself to you, rather than the other way around. >=20 > > HTML in email is here to stay and, I for one, will not go back. >=20 > spoken like a true jerk. >=20 > rday >=20 >=20 >=20 ------=_NextPart_000_00FC_01C2111B.3643FE10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
unsubscribing from the list until this = thread is=20 over ( one more time)
 
Can we finish this once for=20 all?
 
Will try back in three = weeks
 
Daniel
----- Original Message -----
From: "rpjday" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
To: "Jesse W. Asher" <jasher1@tampabay.rr.com>
Cc: <netfilter@lists.samba.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:27 = AM
Subject: Re: The posting of HTML format = messages to=20 this List!!!!

> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Jesse W. Asher wrote:
> =
> > And=20 why should people continue to use an older paradigm rather than
> = >=20 using a newer one?
>
> because the older one works just = fine,=20 thanks.
>
> > Are you suggesting that perhaps we should = all go=20
> > back to using ASCII editors instead of word = processors?
>=20
> you should use the correct tool for the job and, in many = cases,
>=20 having information in plain ASCII is a much more sensible = decision.
> >=20
> > My response to this is instead of asking everyone else to = limit=20
> > themselves perhaps you should either upgrade your mail = reader to=20 one
> > that handles HTML or come to the conclusion that the = rest of=20 the world
> > would prefer to live in a richer email = environment and=20 learn to live
> > with it.
>
> and my response to = this is=20 that you are a thoroughly inconsiderate
> unthinking buffoon, who = feels=20 that the rest of the world should
> accommodate itself to you, = rather than=20 the other way around.
>
> > HTML in email is here to = stay and, I=20 for one, will not go back.
>
> spoken like a true = jerk.
>=20
> rday
>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_00FC_01C2111B.3643FE10--