From: "Simon Garner" <sgarner@expio.co.nz>
To: SBlaze <dagent.geo@yahoo.com>, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: a sort of n00b question here but I'ld like to know.
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:49:35 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <013f01c39776$2d3ddd30$0301a8c0@SIMON> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20031021012423.84839.qmail@web40210.mail.yahoo.com
On Tuesday, October 21, 2003 2:24 PM [GMT+1200=NZT],
SBlaze <dagent.geo@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Ok I did that(with top) My CPU usage for both procs is relativly low.
> They both tend to idle with other visable processes at 96-100% idle.
>
> root@nixn00b:~# vmstat
> procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system--
> ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo
> in cs us sy id wa 0 0 27464 5848 22848 44388 0 0
> 1 2 11 8 0 1 99 0
>
Looks fine... sounds to me like this is a red herring, are you sure your
problem is not just with your connection itself? You said:
> The reason I ask is that I have what I think is an unusual amount of
> inbound unsolicited udp traffic(which is dropped by
> iptables/netfilter).
>
Inbound unsolicited traffic will be dropped with or without iptables -
you don't need a firewall to stop that as it won't have anywhere to go
anyway. And you'd have to have a serious amount of traffic to choke the
CPU like that. But, that traffic could be using up your bandwidth of
course... If that's a possibility, you need to find out more about where
the traffic is coming from and where it's going to and why you're
receiving it.
-Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-21 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-21 0:02 a sort of n00b question here but I'ld like to know Daniel Chemko
2003-10-21 0:41 ` SBlaze
2003-10-21 1:08 ` Simon Garner
2003-10-21 1:24 ` SBlaze
2003-10-21 1:49 ` Simon Garner [this message]
2003-10-21 2:03 ` SBlaze
2003-10-21 2:33 ` Simon Garner
2003-10-21 2:49 ` SBlaze
2003-10-21 4:46 ` Alistair Tonner
2003-10-21 18:11 ` SBlaze
2003-10-21 21:12 ` Simon Garner
2003-10-21 22:36 ` SBlaze
2003-10-22 0:08 ` Alistair Tonner
2003-10-21 2:34 ` Jeffrey Laramie
2003-10-21 2:56 ` SBlaze
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-21 19:44 Daniel Chemko
2003-10-20 23:37 Eric Marchionni
2003-10-20 1:39 SBlaze
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='013f01c39776$2d3ddd30$0301a8c0@SIMON' \
--to=sgarner@expio.co.nz \
--cc=dagent.geo@yahoo.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox