Re: PATCH-O-MATIC (installation issue)

["Joshua C. Clark" <Josh@NetworkMedics.Com>]

I am so stupid, I didnt realize that by simply downloading the package that
was the IPTABLES source directory, however when I run the runme it asks if i
want to patch but when I say yes to any of them it tells me it is missing
files.. Any ideas?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob Sterenborg" <rob@sterenborg.info>
To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: PATCH-O-MATIC (installation issue)


> > I can find the kernerl source but I cannot seem to find the iptables
> > source, and when I point it to the same location as my linux kernel
> > it fails saying it doesnt know the IPTABLES source, does this make
> > sense, and thank you for following up!
>
> Ah, yes you did write that.. Sorry about that.
> All sources are separate packages. I don't know if you have installed
> the iptables source.
> However, I'd recommend to download the source of both iptables and POM
> snapshots from the ftp site of the Netfilter project as you can download
> more up-to-date sources.
>
>
> Gr,
> Rob
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rob Sterenborg" <rob@sterenborg.info>
> > To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 1:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: PATCH-O-MATIC (installation issue)
> >
> >
> >>> I am new to the forum so hopefully I am doing this right, I am
> >>> trying to install PATCH-O-MATIC on either RedHat or CentOS but I
> >>> dont know where the iptables source installation is, sorry if this
> >>> is posted elsewhere..
> >>
> >> If you installed the kernel source (it's a package), you probably
> >> find it in /usr/src
> >>
> >>
> >> Gr,
> >> Rob
>
>
>
> -- 
> IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of  the individual
> addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is
> confidential, privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons
> with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious
> beliefs. If you are not  the intended recipient, any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this email is not
> authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an
> irritating social faux pas. Unless the word absquatulation has been
> used in its correct context somewhere other than in this warning, it
> does not have any legal or grammatical use and may be ignored. No
> animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, although the
> yorkshire terrier next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell
> you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the unknown will be
> gratified to learn that there is no hidden message revealed by reading
> this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice from
> Microsoft: However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around
> yourself and your computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and
> your pets. If you have received this email in error, please add some
> nutmeg and egg whites and place it in a warm oven for 40 minutes. Whisk
> briefly and let it stand for 2 hours before icing.
>
>
>