From: "Eric Geater 9/01/04" <egeater@mscoinc.com>
To: Netfilter Mailing List <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Port forwarding or NAT?
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:32:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01ef01c49a5f$51824900$6300a8c0@93egeater> (raw)
I have one crazy machine at our home office that must communicate on
port 6847 to an outside company. This one machine went through our old
proxy server until it died last week. We're using IPTABLES through
rc.firewall-2.4 on a Linux proxy, but it doesn't seem to be allowing
this communication to occur.
Would this be handled through port forwarding or NAT? I was under the
impression that our firewall was set up to allow all traffic, initated
from the LAN, through. This apparently isn't the case, however.
Eric
next reply other threads:[~2004-09-14 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-14 13:32 Eric Geater 9/01/04 [this message]
2004-09-14 17:13 ` Port forwarding or NAT? Jason Opperisano
2004-09-14 17:18 ` Rob Sterenborg
2004-09-15 5:47 ` Alistair Tonner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01ef01c49a5f$51824900$6300a8c0@93egeater' \
--to=egeater@mscoinc.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox