Re: SO HOW! iptables: invalid argument

["John Paul" <voltaire@pinoylinux.sytes.net>]

> Ummm.
>
>    I would personally apply POM before building iptables code

I actually did the other way around but still have same problem "invalid
argument"

i have two versions of iptables running.

iptables (from rpm /sbin/iptables) = works okay
iptables (from source /usr/local/sbin/iptables) = invalid argument

my Q is... why did the iptables from source didnt work. any helpful hint?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alistair Tonner" <Alistair@nerdnet.ca>
To: "John Paul" <john@pinoylinux.sytes.net>; <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: SO HOW! iptables: invalid argument


> On October 25, 2003 09:40 am, John Paul wrote:
> > Hello Folks,
> >
> > Just want to find the real answer with this. sorry but ans to google is
not
> > clear for me. I did upgrade my iptables to iptables-1.2.9rc1.tar. steps
> > done;
> >
> > --> installed new iptables source (iptables-1.2.9rc1.tar)
> >         - make KERNEL_DIR=/usr/local/linux
> >         - make install KERNEL_DIR=/usr/local/linux
> >
> > --> applied POM (patch-o-matic-20030912.tar) to my latest kernel
> > (linux-2.4.22.tar)
> >
> > --> recompile the kernel
> >         - make dep; make clean; make bzImage; make modules; make
> > modules_install
> >         - all went fine
> >
> > --> reboot the machine
> >
> > all went fine but when NAT/MASQUERADE is used, i got this "iptables:
> > invalid argument"
> >
> > anything i missed?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > -JP
>
>
> Ummm.
>
>    I would personally apply POM before building iptables code....
>
> if you do find  / -name iptables ... how many results do you get?
>
> I've found followup installs don't tend to sit on top of original
installs,
> thus you likely have two copies of iptables stuff on your system now...
you
> need todetermine which to remove.
>
>
> --
>
> Alistair Tonner
> nerdnet.ca
> Senior Systems Analyst - RSS
>
>      Any sufficiently advanced technology will have the appearance of
magic.
> Lets get magical!