Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Humme <jan.humme@xs4all.nl>
To: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>, netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Clear Iptables chains?
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:14:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0207081914340A.14428@Lms> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020708170139.UTNE19225.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@there>

On Monday 08 July 2002 19:01, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Monday 08 July 2002 5:34 pm, Jan Humme wrote:
> > On Monday 08 July 2002 17:22, Antony Stone wrote:
> > > I'd prefer to see:
> > > iptables -P INPUT DROP
> > > iptables -P OUTPUT DROP
> > > iptables -P FORWARD DROP
> > >
> > > Then you add in the rules for the stuff your definitely know you want
> > > to allow.
> >
> > Certainly.
> >
> > What about default policies for the nat and mangle tables?
>
> Those should be ACCEPT, unless you're being sneaky/clever, and you
> definitely know what you are doing..
>
> The reasons are simple:
>
> 1. The choice of whether to block or accept packets should be done in the
> filtering table - that's what it's for.   The nat table is for address
> translation, and the mangle table is for packet mangling.   Don't drop
> packets in the nat table; drop them in the filter table.

Makes perfect sense.


> 2. If you start setting default policies of anything except ACCEPT in the
> nat or mangle tables, it's very easy to stop all traffic through your
> firewall, and spend some time scratching your head trying to figure out
> why, because there are no rules in the filter table causing the behaviour
> you observe.

..........as I already found out...............(!).

Jan Humme.


  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-08 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-08 14:43 Clear Iptables chains? Denis JULIEN
2002-07-08 14:46 ` Lukas Ruf
2002-07-08 14:56   ` Antony Stone
2002-07-08 15:22     ` Antony Stone
2002-07-08 16:34       ` Jan Humme
2002-07-08 17:01         ` Antony Stone
2002-07-08 17:14           ` Jan Humme [this message]
2002-07-08 16:43       ` Ross Vandegrift

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0207081914340A.14428@Lms \
    --to=jan.humme@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox