From: "hare ram" <hareram@sol.net.in>
To: Daniel Wittenberg <daniel-wittenberg@starken.com>,
netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: load balance problem
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 13:38:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <030501c2c2b6$ae7c18c0$13fcc5cb@Housecall> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1043301815.2968.5.camel@runabout.noc.starken.com
Hi
The one it installs with Redhat RPM of IPROUTE
is borken AFAIK, better get lastest tar and install
i had same problem, after installing the new Iproute, the routes works
fine
hare
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Wittenberg" <daniel-wittenberg@starken.com>
To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:33 AM
Subject: load balance problem
> I've been trying to test the load balancing in our lab and it doesn't
> appear to be working. I have a RH 8.0 firewall, which appears to have
> all the specified options set in the kernel .config. I am running a
> sniffer on both out-going links, and only ever see traffic go down one
> or the other, never both. It's always the one I list first:
>
> ip route add default scope global equalize \
> nexthop via 172.27.3.3 dev eth1 weight 1 onlink \
> nexthop via 172.27.1.1 dev eth0 weight 1 onlink
>
> What looks weird is the output:
> # /sbin/ip route list
> 172.27.15.0/24 dev eth2 scope link
> 172.27.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.27.1.200
> 172.27.3.0/24 dev eth1 scope link
> 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
> default equalize
> nexthop via 172.27.3.3 dev eth1 weight 1 dead onlink pervasive
> nexthop via 172.27.1.1 dev eth0 weight 1 onlink
>
> The 172.27.3 and .1 are both the external links, but I haven't found an
> explanation for what "dead" and "pervasive" are. I also don't see those
> showing up in any of the examples I've seen. So any clues why this only
> goes out the first link? I first thought kernel or default gateway, but
> made sure the original default gateway was not specified, and the kernel
> appears to be correct. Something else I've obviously missed?
>
> Thanks!
> Dan
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-23 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-23 6:03 load balance problem Daniel Wittenberg
2003-01-23 8:08 ` hare ram [this message]
2003-01-23 11:52 ` How to Stop scanings hare ram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='030501c2c2b6$ae7c18c0$13fcc5cb@Housecall' \
--to=hareram@sol.net.in \
--cc=daniel-wittenberg@starken.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox