From: "Brandon Broyles" <netfilter@drbroyles.com>
To: fabrice@netfilter.org, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Am I making a bone-headed mistake with patch-o-matic ?
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 00:53:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <038e01c2937d$cece8030$4545450a@drbroyles.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200211241243.59265.fabrice@netfilter.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fabrice MARIE" <fabrice@netfilter.org>
To: <netfilter@drbroyles.com>; <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 11:43 PM
Subject: Re: Am I making a bone-headed mistake with patch-o-matic ?
> There is a problem though (fixed in the CVS, but not yet updated on the
HTML page..)
> you shouldn't run # make patch-o-matic, but instead from the patch-o-matic
directory,
> you should run the ./runme script with the patch suite you want to apply
as a parameter.
> The corrected SGML source of the document is there :
>
http://cvs.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/netfilter/documentation/H
OWTO/netfilter-extensions-HOWTO.sgml
From what I read in the above link, I think something may be wrong with my
patch-o-matic I got via CVS. I ran a (./runme base) and I got the following
output. In this output the only thing that is "Already applied:" is the
first line. Nothing else seems to be applied after that. Plus, that link
above references switches ( Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/q/?] )
that I am not getting.
*********************************************************************
Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not.
Almost every one has bugs, so I don't recommend applying them all!
-------------------------------------------------------
Already applied: submitted/2.4.18
submitted/ahesp-static
submitted/arptables
submitted/config-cleanup
submitted/conntrack?helper-unregister
submitted/conntrack
submitted/dscp
submitted/DSCP
submitted/ecn
submitted/ECN
submitted/helper
submitted/ip6tables-export-symbols
submitted/ip6tables-exthdr-bug-ipv6
submitted/ip_conntrack_protocol_destroy
submitted/ip_conntrack_protocol_unregister
submitted/ip_nat_irc-srcaddr-fix
submitted/ipt_MIRROR-ttl
submitted/ipt_REJECT-checkentry
submitted/ipt_unclean-ecn
submitted/ipv6-agr-ipv6
submitted/irc-dcc-mask
submitted/length-ipv6
submitted/local-nat
submitted/log-tunnel-fix-ipv6
submitted/macro-trailing-semicolon-fix
submitted/mangle5hooks
submitted/nat-export_symbols
submitted/nat-memoryleak-fix
submitted/netfilter-arp
submitted/ownercmd
submitted/pkttype
submitted/REJECT-dont_fragment
submitted/REJECT_mark
submitted/remove_no_version
submitted/skb_clone_copy
submitted/TOS-oops-fix
submitted/ulog-module-unload
submitted/ulog-nlgroup-shift-fix
submitted/ulog-sparc-bitops-fix
submitted/unclean-udpchecksum
submitted/z-newnat16
submitted/z-newnat_assertfix
submitted/z-newnat_changeexpect-lockfix
pending/newnat-udp-helper
base/ahesp6-ipv6
base/frag6-ipv6
base/fuzzy
base/iplimit
base/ipt_unclean-ubit
base/ipv4options
base/IPV4OPTSSTRIP
base/ipv6header-ipv6
base/mport
base/NETLINK
base/NETMAP
base/nth
base/opts6-ipv6
base/pool
base/psd
base/quota
base/random
base/realm
base/REJECT-ipv6
base/route6-ipv6
base/SAME
base/time
base/TTL
-----------------------------------------------------------------
No more patches to apply! Q to Quit or ? for options [Q/a/r/b/?]
Excellent! Kernel is now ready for compilation.
*********************************************************************
I never get a chance to choose which patches I wish to install. Before I
wrote that first message to this mail list, I had already tried recompiling
the kernel and iptables after I ran (./runme base). Does it look like my
patch-o-matic is working incorrectly?
Thanks,
Brandon Broyles
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-24 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-23 16:34 Am I making a bone-headed mistake with patch-o-matic ? netfilter
2002-11-24 4:43 ` Fabrice MARIE
2002-11-24 5:40 ` electrode
2002-11-24 5:53 ` Brandon Broyles [this message]
2002-11-24 17:32 ` Is there something wrong with patch-o-matic? Brandon Broyles
2002-11-24 17:45 ` Alexandros Papadopoulos
2002-11-24 18:10 ` electrode
2002-11-28 2:24 ` Fabrice MARIE
2002-11-28 3:14 ` Brandon Broyles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='038e01c2937d$cece8030$4545450a@drbroyles.com' \
--to=netfilter@drbroyles.com \
--cc=fabrice@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox