From: "David Busby" <busby@pnts.com>
To: "PiSiC..." <pisic@service.agress.ro>,
mattgrogan@bigfoot.com, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: DHCP related problem
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:58:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <066501c334f1$a4cee110$1100000a@busbydev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 000901c334d6$62853a90$c80da8c0@pisic
The ISC DHCP server has some hooks (see man) that can notify you of a lease.
Those events could drive a script that modifies you firewall rules.
/B
----- Original Message -----
From: "PiSiC..." <pisic@service.agress.ro>
To: <mattgrogan@bigfoot.com>; <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 06:43
Subject: Re: DHCP related problem
> I see that i wasn't very explicit...
> so... what i have: i have 12 stations in my LAN. I have set up DHCP with
> FixedAdress for those.
> I work in a computers service and i have a variable number of machines
that
> come and go .
> I set up a pool for those fixed address computers and another one for
> unknown clients which is more restrictive.
> To get to my problem ... I want to drop anyone who sets his IP address and
> GW etc. staticaly.
> I want to let them access only if they request their address by DHCP.
> Any hints ?
>
> Thanks in advance ,
>
> Danila Octavian
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matt Grogan" <mattgrogan@nyc.rr.com>
> To: "'PiSiC...'" <pisic@service.agress.ro>;
<netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:24 PM
> Subject: RE: DHCP related problem
>
>
> > You could set up DHCP with a smaller set of addresses, for example
> > x.x.x.100- x.x.x.110 if you only have 10 workstations. Then drop
> everything
> > accessing the Internet except for those source addresses.
> >
> > If you want to go further than that, like stop someone from getting
their
> > information from DHCP and then statically defining it and keeping that
> > address, it gets a little more involved. Maybe reducing the lease time
and
> > scripting to check that all the stations in the DHCP range are also in
the
> > list of DHCP clients on the server would help.
> >
> > Matt Grogan
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
> > [mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org] On Behalf Of PiSiC...
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 4:31 AM
> > To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I want to ask you something... You know a possibility to drop outgoing
> > traffic of clients who define their address staticaly instead of using
my
> > DHCP server ?
> > I also want to allow outgoing access to those who have their IP address
> > given by my DHCP server.
> >
> > Thank you in advance,
> > Danila Octavian
> >
> >
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-17 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-17 8:30 DHCP related problem PiSiC...
2003-06-17 11:24 ` Matt Grogan
2003-06-17 12:46 ` Julian Gomez
2003-06-17 13:43 ` PiSiC...
2003-06-17 16:58 ` David Busby [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='066501c334f1$a4cee110$1100000a@busbydev' \
--to=busby@pnts.com \
--cc=mattgrogan@bigfoot.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=pisic@service.agress.ro \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox