From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Adam D. Barratt" Subject: Re: HTTP Port forwarding issues Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:20:23 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <086201c226c5$4567f990$3200a8c0@jungle.funkybadger.org> References: <40c701c226bd$a51c87a0$2901a8c0@amos> <20020708205030.ECXA4119.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@there> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.samba.org Antony Stone wrote: > On Monday 08 July 2002 9:25 pm, Nathan Cassano wrote: > > > Remember HTTP runs over UDP protocol also. > > WHAT ????? > > RFC # ? I'd disagree with that statement as well, but as a side note HTTP is not limited to TCP. RFC2616 (HTTP/1.1) says: 1.4 Overall Operation [...] HTTP communication usually takes place over TCP/IP connections. The default port is TCP 80 [19], but other ports can be used. This does not preclude HTTP from being implemented on top of any other protocol on the Internet, or on other networks. HTTP only presumes a reliable transport; any protocol that provides such guarantees can be used; [...] 19.6.3 Changes from RFC 2068 [...] 4. Modified some TCP-specific language, to make it clearer that non-TCP transports are possible for HTTP. UDP, however, doesn't fit the definition of "reliable transport", IMO. Adam