From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Josefsson Subject: Re: PPTP+NAT+MASQ anyone? Date: 09 Dec 2002 16:17:27 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1039447047.25961.47.camel@tux> References: <200212091226.23888.roy@karlsbakk.net> <200212091512.10109.roy@karlsbakk.net> <1039444945.28074.43.camel@tux> <200212091558.22457.roy@karlsbakk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200212091558.22457.roy@karlsbakk.net> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk Cc: Netfilter mailinglist On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 15:58, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > > You said "the only one I've managed to patch-o-matic" which means the > > only one you've managed to patch. What you are saying now is that you > > indeed did manage to patch your kernel. Please use more accurate wording > > in reports like these. > > the only one I have been able to patch up with the patch-o-matic pptp patch, > was 2.4.18. > > > And you are NOT using patch-o-matic from cvs, I know this because these > > problems were fixed some time ago (and doublechecking the files I see > > that they were indeed fixed). The error you are seeing is _impossible_ > > with patch-o-matic from cvs (the #error lines doesn't even exist) > > I've tried all the ones I can find. > When trying to apply the pptp-conntrack-nat.patch, I get errors applying it. > Do I need to hand patch this thing? I've tried with 2.4.{18,19,20} Did you run './runme pending' first like the documentation tells you? -- /Martin Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.