From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Dharmendra.T" <dharmu@nsecure.net>
Subject: Re: QOS
Date: 19 Dec 2002 13:35:06 +0530
Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
Message-ID: <1040285143.5920.0.camel@india>
References: <1040280504.11113.140.camel@bigblue>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <1040280504.11113.140.camel@bigblue>
Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Paulo Andre <pandre@darkstar.nom.za>
Cc: netfilter <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>

HTB has very good options than CBQ. But bit confusing...

Regards
Dharmendra.T
Linux Security Expert

On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 12:18, Paulo Andre wrote:
> Which is the better package to use for QOS??
> HTB or CBQ..???
> 
> Paulo
> 
> 
> 
>