From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Leblond <eleblond@init-sys.com>
Subject: Re: Network bandwidth usage monitor
Date: 07 Feb 2003 17:51:40 +0100
Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
Message-ID: <1044636705.7633.1.camel@tech004>
References: <001001c2cec6$d6310b20$0200a8c0@whyzpc>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <001001c2cec6$d6310b20$0200a8c0@whyzpc>
Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 17:34, Erik Ahlner wrote:
> Hi!
>=20
> I have used IPtraf for measuring how much of my network is beeing used fo=
r a
> while now, but since I got 100mbit connection it doesn't fulfill my
> needs..when downloading thing in 5 megabytes/second, Iptraf says
> 300kb/second.. not very accurate huh?

traffic monitor in iptraf is not really accurate. use "detailed
statitistc information". It's really more accurate.

--=20
=C9ric Leblond
courriel : eleblond@init-sys.com