From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Josefsson Subject: Re: strange phenomena about ip_conntrack Date: 24 May 2003 00:54:03 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1053730443.713.167.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se> References: <004401c31f72$57415ca0$02020a0a@acamarpeng> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <004401c31f72$57415ca0$02020a0a@acamarpeng> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: pengjie Cc: Netfilter On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 10:24, pengjie wrote: > After 2 days, the conntrack table is full, /var/log/messages display > the ip_conntrack_count is 167, and /proc/net/ip_conntrack is empty. > > Why?!, Why the ip_conntrack_count is bigger than ip_conntrack_max? > Why is /proc/net/ip_conntrack is empty? > how can this occurs? > > who can help me? Can you try a newer kernel? (I'd recommend 2.4.21-rc3) And if you still have the same problem, try enabling netfilter debugging in the kernel configuration (or at least enable the IP_NF_ASSERT macro in include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_conntrack.h) -- /Martin