From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ray Leach Subject: Re: accept local processes ... Date: 27 May 2003 17:32:03 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1054049523.13296.93.camel@raylinux.internal> References: <000501c32455$2eb79870$1405a8c0@ew2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TrCWZNtZ1CZ9rMGRCFS6" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <000501c32455$2eb79870$1405a8c0@ew2> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Netfilter Mailing List --=-TrCWZNtZ1CZ9rMGRCFS6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2003-05-26 at 23:33, Volker Augustin wrote: > hello everybody, one question, why does > a rule like: > iptables -A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1 -j ACCEPT > give this result? > ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere >=20 What did you type to get this result? iptables -nL INPUT > im very confused....i want all local proccesses to have access to all > services, this is ok i think and needed for database access to localhost = etc > and to all virtual network devices...(i think so) > can anybody explain me this behaviour? i read a lot about iptables, try > around for weeks, everything was fine but this. >=20 > thanks in advance > volker >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 --=-TrCWZNtZ1CZ9rMGRCFS6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+04Tzh1fuR/Bv+ygRAvekAJ48UgMIFVkN3m5UYaLzEmWRJ5dGJQCfcbm9 xtEOXj/ZGV88kn4EqzmFfrw= =yxSJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-TrCWZNtZ1CZ9rMGRCFS6--