From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ray Leach Subject: Re: vpn between networks with private ip network segment conflicts Date: 27 May 2003 18:30:25 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1054053025.13730.95.camel@raylinux.internal> References: <1054051400.1836.56.camel@lo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZKwW7WoSEwRIkdGGNa7D" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1054051400.1836.56.camel@lo> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Netfilter Mailing List --=-ZKwW7WoSEwRIkdGGNa7D Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 18:03, Drew Einhorn wrote: > My LAN uses network segments 192.168.0.0/24, 192.168.1.0/24, etc. > So does the remote network I need to vpn to (probably using some flavor > of pptp). >=20 > Is there an odd nat variant that will solve this problem. > Probably need to do some kind of dns transformation on each side. >=20 > Is there any easy solution. Perhaps it would be easier (but not easy) > to get the network segments renumbered on one end or the other. Oooo ... I would go with the second option. Get one end renumbered. --=-ZKwW7WoSEwRIkdGGNa7D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+05Khh1fuR/Bv+ygRAmHEAJ9afrPV2/EV1S1NDAydZBHEN2peQACdH565 EwLCL4+xmrbMLItn80xb0zs= =xN+p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZKwW7WoSEwRIkdGGNa7D--