From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Drew Einhorn Subject: Re: vpn between networks with private ip network segment conflicts Date: 27 May 2003 11:34:53 -0600 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1054056892.1837.85.camel@lo> References: <1054051400.1836.56.camel@lo> <1054053025.13730.95.camel@raylinux.internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1054053025.13730.95.camel@raylinux.internal> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Ray Leach Cc: Netfilter Mailing List Oooo ... I was afraid that was going to be the answer. I'll wait a bit and see if someone has a better idea before starting in on renumbering a network. On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 10:30, Ray Leach wrote: > On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 18:03, Drew Einhorn wrote: > > My LAN uses network segments 192.168.0.0/24, 192.168.1.0/24, etc. > > So does the remote network I need to vpn to (probably using some flavor > > of pptp). > > > > Is there an odd nat variant that will solve this problem. > > Probably need to do some kind of dns transformation on each side. > > > > Is there any easy solution. Perhaps it would be easier (but not easy) > > to get the network segments renumbered on one end or the other. > > Oooo ... I would go with the second option. Get one end renumbered. -- Drew Einhorn