Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ray Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
To: Netfilter Mailing List <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: netfilter resets TCP conversation that was DNATed from the local machine to another
Date: 30 Jun 2003 16:44:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1056984240.1473.18.camel@raylinux.internal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030630142908.GA29083@cannon.eng.us.uu.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1498 bytes --]

This is an IE browser problem.
Normal browsers don't send RST after the connection has ended.

On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 16:29, Ramin Dousti wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 07:22:13PM -0700, Michael wrote:
> 
> > What would you like me to confirm? That it's broken? It is broken. That 
> > the RST sending port is not the same as the initiating SYN port? It is 
> > not; it's low, just above 1024, so I assumed it to be 
> > netfilter-generated, whereas the Squid port was in the 30000 range. That 
> > my rule set isn't sending it? "I have no reject-with-tcp-reset lines in 
> > my tables." Don't know what else you could mean.
> 
> What I mean is this:
> 
> squid:		ip1:port1
> webserver:	ip2:80
> 
> Then what you say is:
> 
> packet1:	ip1:port1 -> ip2:80    (SYN)
> packet2:	ip2:80    -> ip1:port1 (SYN ACK)
> packet3:	ip1:port2 -> ip2:80    (RST)
> 
> What I'm saying is that the third packet should not be able to tear down
> the connection between ip1:port1 <-> ip2:80  just because the ports are
> different. The TCP stack on ip2 should discard this RST packet...
> 
> Again, my question:
> do you see any other packets between ip1:port1 <-> ip2:port2 after the RST
> packet?
> 
> Ramin
> 
> 
> 
-- 
--
Raymond Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
Network Support Specialist
http://www.knowledgefactory.co.za
"lynx -source http://www.rchq.co.za/raymondl.asc | gpg --import"
Key fingerprint = 7209 A695 9EE0 E971 A9AD  00EE 8757 EE47 F06F FB28
--

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-30 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-28  3:50 netfilter resets TCP conversation that was DNATed from the local machine to another Michael
2003-06-29 21:55 ` Arnt Karlsen
2003-06-30  2:01 ` Ramin Dousti
2003-06-30  2:22   ` Michael
2003-06-30  5:12     ` Alistair Tonner
2003-06-30 14:29     ` Ramin Dousti
2003-06-30 14:44       ` Ray Leach [this message]
2003-06-30 14:52         ` Ramin Dousti
2003-06-30 20:07       ` Michael
2003-07-01  6:00         ` Alistair Tonner
2003-07-01 14:34           ` Ramin Dousti
2003-07-01 16:24           ` Michael
     [not found]             ` <200307020206.13952.Alistair@nerdnet.ca>
2003-07-02 21:39               ` Michael

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1056984240.1473.18.camel@raylinux.internal \
    --to=raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox