From: Ray Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
To: Netfilter Mailing List <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: netfilter resets TCP conversation that was DNATed from the local machine to another
Date: 30 Jun 2003 16:44:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1056984240.1473.18.camel@raylinux.internal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030630142908.GA29083@cannon.eng.us.uu.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1498 bytes --]
This is an IE browser problem.
Normal browsers don't send RST after the connection has ended.
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 16:29, Ramin Dousti wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 07:22:13PM -0700, Michael wrote:
>
> > What would you like me to confirm? That it's broken? It is broken. That
> > the RST sending port is not the same as the initiating SYN port? It is
> > not; it's low, just above 1024, so I assumed it to be
> > netfilter-generated, whereas the Squid port was in the 30000 range. That
> > my rule set isn't sending it? "I have no reject-with-tcp-reset lines in
> > my tables." Don't know what else you could mean.
>
> What I mean is this:
>
> squid: ip1:port1
> webserver: ip2:80
>
> Then what you say is:
>
> packet1: ip1:port1 -> ip2:80 (SYN)
> packet2: ip2:80 -> ip1:port1 (SYN ACK)
> packet3: ip1:port2 -> ip2:80 (RST)
>
> What I'm saying is that the third packet should not be able to tear down
> the connection between ip1:port1 <-> ip2:80 just because the ports are
> different. The TCP stack on ip2 should discard this RST packet...
>
> Again, my question:
> do you see any other packets between ip1:port1 <-> ip2:port2 after the RST
> packet?
>
> Ramin
>
>
>
--
--
Raymond Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
Network Support Specialist
http://www.knowledgefactory.co.za
"lynx -source http://www.rchq.co.za/raymondl.asc | gpg --import"
Key fingerprint = 7209 A695 9EE0 E971 A9AD 00EE 8757 EE47 F06F FB28
--
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-30 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-28 3:50 netfilter resets TCP conversation that was DNATed from the local machine to another Michael
2003-06-29 21:55 ` Arnt Karlsen
2003-06-30 2:01 ` Ramin Dousti
2003-06-30 2:22 ` Michael
2003-06-30 5:12 ` Alistair Tonner
2003-06-30 14:29 ` Ramin Dousti
2003-06-30 14:44 ` Ray Leach [this message]
2003-06-30 14:52 ` Ramin Dousti
2003-06-30 20:07 ` Michael
2003-07-01 6:00 ` Alistair Tonner
2003-07-01 14:34 ` Ramin Dousti
2003-07-01 16:24 ` Michael
[not found] ` <200307020206.13952.Alistair@nerdnet.ca>
2003-07-02 21:39 ` Michael
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1056984240.1473.18.camel@raylinux.internal \
--to=raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox