From: Wolfgang Pichler <madmin@dialog-telekom.at>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: backroute problem
Date: 24 Jul 2003 08:24:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1059035062.1937.2.camel@defiant.dialog> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09B04A55822EFF4DA48D2E0BB2941D4A15BF94@wardrive.citadelcomputer.com.au>
i am not an expert - but how can i use iproute2 routing by source ip ?
If i understand the whole thing right then the webserver doesn't get the
ip of the firewall as source ip - it gets the original ip - so - how can
iproute2 then know which packet was comming from the firewall and which
packet was comming from the old gateway.
But another thing come to mind: Wouldn't it be possible to Mark the
packets on the firewall - and then tell iproute2 to route marked packets
to the firewall back ?
mfG
Wolfi
Am Mit, 2003-07-23 um 21.58 schrieb George Vieira:
> You have to use iproute2 to route by source IP and not destination (default gateway).
>
> There is an iptables patch in p-o-m which does some funky iproute stuff too but not sure the name.. have a look
>
> Thanks,
> ____________________________________________
> George Vieira
> Systems Manager
> georgev@citadelcomputer.com.au
>
> Citadel Computer Systems Pty Ltd
> http://www.citadelcomputer.com.au
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfgang Pichler [mailto:madmin@dialog-telekom.at]
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 6:03 AM
> To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Subject: backroute problem
>
>
> hi all,
>
> we have got new ip addresses - the old one's still exists so that i can
> migrate them to the new ones.
>
> the old ip's are directly assigned to the web/mail server (i know that
> this isn't good - but i havn't had a fireall at this time) - now i have
> a seperate firewall which has the new ip's assigned to it.
>
> Now i'd like to change the dns entries so that the traffic goes over the
> new ip's (a 4 MBit line ;-) ) - the problem i have is:
>
> when a packet on the new ip comes then it gets prerouted by the firewall
> to the webserver - the webserver gets the packet with the original
> source address - now to webserver wants to answer to the packet - but
> becuase of the old ip's the webserver have a default route with the old
> ip and try's to route the packet over the old gateway - and not back to
> the firewall... You know - that can't work.
>
> I am now searching for a solution for this problem. Can netfilter help
> me with this problem - or do i have to use iproute (i havn't ever done
> something with iproute) help me ?
>
> Can i mark the packet's so the the webserver can send them back in the
> right direction ?
>
> mfG
> Wolfi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-24 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-23 21:58 backroute problem George Vieira
2003-07-24 8:24 ` Wolfgang Pichler [this message]
2003-07-24 11:53 ` Wolfgang Pichler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-23 20:03 Wolfgang Pichler
2003-07-23 20:00 Wolfgang Pichler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1059035062.1937.2.camel@defiant.dialog \
--to=madmin@dialog-telekom.at \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).