From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Leblond <eric@regit.org>
Subject: Re: IPTABLES Nightmare - Save Me
Date: 05 Aug 2003 08:13:51 +0200
Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
Message-ID: <1060064031.1260.4.camel@porky>
References: <3F2EEFA2.4040208@flashmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-OaETdZhdFWOxZPTwh+EF"
Return-path: <netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <3F2EEFA2.4040208@flashmail.com>
Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter/>
To: dalive@flashmail.com
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org


--=-OaETdZhdFWOxZPTwh+EF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le mar 05/08/2003 =E0 01:43, DALive Editor a =E9crit :
> =09
>=20
> Iptable seems flawed (DNAT)

Maybe this doc can be useful
It try to explain the why of the situation INPUT and FORWARD difference:
	http://home.regit.org/iptables.html

Hope this will help,
--=20
Eric Leblond <eric@regit.org>

--=-OaETdZhdFWOxZPTwh+EF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/L0sfnxA7CdMWjzIRAnO5AJ9tL9sqWh6DYTuocJUY8qDYpdYZggCfViUv
cvGCjFj8SrHSz3Vwdc18kG4=
=GZRc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-OaETdZhdFWOxZPTwh+EF--