Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Spenneberg <lists@spenneberg.org>
To: Christof Nyffenegger <cnyf@yahoo.de>
Cc: Jim Carter <jimc@math.ucla.edu>,
	Netfilter <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: unexpected behaviour...?
Date: 02 Sep 2003 22:26:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1062534369.6144.24.camel@kermit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030828113329.32071.qmail@web21404.mail.yahoo.com>

Am Don, 2003-08-28 um 13.33 schrieb Christof Nyffenegger:
>  --- Jim Carter <jimc@math.ucla.edu> schrieb:
> > Hmmm, good point.  However, I think a packet is considered to be part of an
> > established connection because it has particular header bits set, not
> > because of IP address matching in the conntrack tables.  Someone who's more
> > familiar with the sources, could you please confirm or correct this
> > statement?
No bits in the header. It is simply matching the IP addresses, protocol
and ports. If you add the TCP-Window-Tracking patch it does more.
At the moment TCP is handled just like  UDP, ICMP, and generic
protocols.

If the client behind the firewall sends an ACK the connection is
automatically picked up by iptables.

Cheers,

Ralf
-- 
Ralf Spenneberg
RHCE, RHCX

Book: Intrusion Detection für Linux Server   http://www.spenneberg.com
IPsec-Howto				     http://www.ipsec-howto.org
Honeynet Project Mirror:                     http://honeynet.spenneberg.org


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-02 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-22 22:42 unexpected behaviour...? Christof Nyffenegger
2003-08-25 21:29 ` Jim Carter
2003-08-26 19:48   ` Christof Nyffenegger
2003-08-27  3:52     ` Jim Carter
2003-08-28 11:33       ` Christof Nyffenegger
2003-08-28 16:29         ` Jim Carter
2003-09-02 19:59         ` Chris Brenton
2003-09-02 20:26         ` Ralf Spenneberg [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-08 21:24 Christof Nyffenegger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1062534369.6144.24.camel@kermit \
    --to=lists@spenneberg.org \
    --cc=cnyf@yahoo.de \
    --cc=jimc@math.ucla.edu \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox