Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ray Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
To: Chris Brenton <cbrenton@chrisbrenton.org>
Cc: Netfilter Mailing List <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Loose source routed IP packets.
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 15:37:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1064324242.25975.111.camel@raylinux.internal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F704912.6010800@chrisbrenton.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1635 bytes --]

On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 15:22, Chris Brenton wrote:
> Ray Leach wrote:
> > 
> > How about :
> > ### don't accept source routed packets
> > /bin/echo "0" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/accept_source_route
> 
> I keep meaning to do some testing with this but have not had the 
> bandwidth. Just wondering if anyone else actually has.
> 
> I would expect the above would work fine with strict source routing, but 
> I'm not so sure about loose source routing unless the firewall was one 
> of the defined jump points.
> 
> For example, let's say I know you "trust" some IP address on the 
> Internet and permit a greater level of access from it to one of your 
> internal systems. I craft the following packet:
> 
> source IP = mine
> Dest IP = "trusted" Internet host
> First byte of IP options = 83
> IP in options field = your internal server
> 
> In this case none of the IPs are the firewalls so I'm not so sure 
> accept_source_route would even be referenced. Does the kernel check the 
> size of all IP headers and process the included options even if its not 
> the destination IP? I would think it would not for efficiency, but then 
> again it might to deal with things like option 7 (record route).
> 
> Has anyone tested this either way?
> 
I suppose the easy answer is to check the kernel source code.

> Thanks in advance!
> Chris
-- 
--
Raymond Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
Network Support Specialist
http://www.knowledgefactory.co.za
"lynx -source http://www.rchq.co.za/raymondl.asc | gpg --import"
Key fingerprint = 7209 A695 9EE0 E971 A9AD  00EE 8757 EE47 F06F FB28
--

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2003-09-23 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-23 11:47 Loose source routed IP packets Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó
2003-09-23 12:12 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2003-09-23 12:31   ` Ray Leach
2003-09-23 13:22     ` Chris Brenton
2003-09-23 13:37       ` Ray Leach [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1064324242.25975.111.camel@raylinux.internal \
    --to=raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za \
    --cc=cbrenton@chrisbrenton.org \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox