From: Joel Newkirk <firewalldude@newkirk.us>
To: Daniel Chemko <dchemko@smgtec.com>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: A humble proposal
Date: 23 Sep 2003 17:10:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1064351408.4385.29.camel@alpha.newkirk.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7C9884991ADAE0479C14F10C858BCDF5122E46@alderaan.smgtec.com>
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 12:13, Daniel Chemko wrote:
> I have been researching some possible extensions to the Netfilter
> environment, and something has become very necessary for my current
> environment. The following proposal outlines what I wish to implement. I
> am wondering if anyone would find value in this. Plus, I look forward to
> feedback so that I may improve my ideas.
> Suggestion:
>
> I would like to take pam_iptables and expand it beyond its simple
> structure. Features will include:
My humble suggestion would be that this should be handled in the stateful
connection tracking - If a session is authenticated and certain connections
are to be allowed, then the new allowed connections would be of state
"related". Really handy would be the ability to distinguish these particular
'related' connections and feed them through specific chains. I for one
would NOT want to simply open the box (or network) wide for every authenticated
connection, but would like to be able to specify a different set of (more
permissive) rules for them once authenticated. Perhaps patch an additional
state - "PAM" or "AUTH". Or the ability to specify a fwmark that is
automatically implemented for RELATED traffic to the authenticated session,
allowing different chains to be traversed based on the mark found.
j
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-23 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-23 16:13 A humble proposal Daniel Chemko
2003-09-23 16:39 ` Eric Leblond
2003-09-23 21:10 ` Joel Newkirk [this message]
2003-10-02 19:51 ` Harald Welte
2003-10-02 21:26 ` Eric Leblond
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-24 10:57 A Humble Proposal John A. Sullivan III
2003-09-26 0:19 A humble proposal Daniel Chemko
2003-09-26 7:21 ` Eric Leblond
2003-09-26 11:53 A Humble Proposal John A. Sullivan III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1064351408.4385.29.camel@alpha.newkirk.us \
--to=firewalldude@newkirk.us \
--cc=dchemko@smgtec.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox