From: "David H. Askew" <daskew2@kc.rr.com>
To: markee@bandwidthco.com
Cc: netfilter users mailing list <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: RE: firewall host problem
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 20:49:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1066614589.2282.3.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <LFEHKEBEBHAFGJBMNKAOAECPCDAA.markee@bandwidthco.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3157 bytes --]
I thought about that too.. but
This output seems to indicate a default policy of ACCEPT on the output
chain. I've not yet formulated a set of rules to handle outbound
traffic.
iptables -L .. partial output ...
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
or .. am I missing your point ?
On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 20:44, Mark E. Donaldson wrote:
> David - Where are your OUTPUT chain Rules? If you want to ping (or anything
> else) your ISP gateway from the firewall itself, you need rules in your
> OUTPUT chain to permit this. If your OUTPUT default policy is set to DROP,
> then all packets generated by your firewall are being dropped.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David H. Askew [mailto:daskew2@kc.rr.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 2:44 PM
> To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Subject: firewall host problem
>
>
>
> ok .. so 'I'm trying to setup my first iptables firewall .. and I've got
> a semi functional setup so far ... but I do have one small problem .. my
> firewall machine .. which is performing NAT for my home network.. cannot
> access the Internet with any standard tools ... tracepath .. ping ..
> etc. I know network connectivity is fine .. because my internal
> machines function properly.
>
> My router/firewall has 3 interfaces ....
> eth0: ISP
> eth1: Home Subnet 1
> eth2: Home Subnet 2
>
> eth2 can ping my ISP gateway
> eth1 can ping my ISP gateway
> eth0 can not ping my ISP gateway
>
>
> my firewall script is below ...
>
> I've recently switched from an ACCEPT default policy to the DROP default
> policy below. I didn't have this problem previously, so I know i'I've
> just forgotten to allow something .. but I'm having trouble coming to a
> logical conclusion ....
>
> ...any help .. critique ... advice you could provide would be helpful
>
> -dave
>
>
> iptables --flush
> iptables --table nat --flush
> iptables --delete-chain
> iptables --table nat --delete-chain
>
>
> # Enable packet forwarding in the kernel
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>
> # Setup IP FORWARDing and Masquerading
> iptables --table nat --append POSTROUTING --out-interface eth0 -j
> MASQUERADE
> iptables --append FORWARD --in-interface eth1 -j ACCEPT
> iptables --append FORWARD --in-interface eth2 -j ACCEPT
>
>
> #enable connection tracking
> iptables -I FORWARD -m state --state INVALID -j DROP
> iptables -I FORWARD -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
>
> iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -i eth0 -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
> iptables -A INPUT -p udp -i eth0 -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
>
> iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -i eth2 -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
> iptables -A INPUT -p udp -i eth2 -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
>
> iptables -P INPUT DROP
>
>
> --
> How many Microsoft engineers does it take to change a light bulb ?
>
> Answer : None, they just declare darkness a new standard.
>
--
How many Microsoft engineers does it take to change a light bulb ?
Answer : None, they just declare darkness a new standard.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-20 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-19 21:44 firewall host problem David H. Askew
2003-10-20 1:44 ` Mark E. Donaldson
2003-10-20 1:49 ` David H. Askew [this message]
2003-10-20 2:02 ` Josh Berry
2003-10-20 3:01 ` David H. Askew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1066614589.2282.3.camel@lappy \
--to=daskew2@kc.rr.com \
--cc=markee@bandwidthco.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox