From: Marc Williams <marcw@onlymooo.com>
To: George Vieira <georgev@citadelcomputer.com.au>
Cc: netfilter list <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: RE: h.323 compatibility
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:48:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1069210128.9755.93.camel@fred.williams.etc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09B04A55822EFF4DA48D2E0BB2941D4A28AD21@wardrive.citadelcomputer.com.au>
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 20:21, George Vieira wrote:
> >And if you're banning my ISP - Comcast - you've just banned the majority of broadband users in the US.
> Hoah!! How cool.. :)
>
:-)
> I have no problems with H323 and using NetMeeting behind a 2.4.19 kernel firewall. The only thing that was needed to get 2 people who are both behind linux firewalls was that 1 had to Host a Meeting for someone outside to connect. I found that part weird..
>
> Have you tried this patch at all yet. Just remember there's 2 modules neededing to be loaded a I forgot one the first time around.
>
The issue isn't with Netmeeting. Rather it's with two other apps I run
that use openh323 - Gnomemeeting and GNUgk both running behind an
iptables FW. I am indeed having problems, particularly with the
gatekeeper. Thus my question about compatibility.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Williams [mailto:marcw@onlymooo.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 19 November 2003 1:13 PM
> > To: netfilter list
> > Subject: h.323 compatibility
> >
> >
> > Even though I'm new to this list, I think that this should probably be
> > addressed by Jozsef Kadlecsik.
> >
> > Jozsef, I've read a couple of your posts on this list that seem to
> > indicate that there is a known incompatibility between your h323
> > conntrack module and the openh323 libraries.
> >
> > Is this accurate? If so, are there any plans to address this
> > incompatibility? I've been unable to get the GNU gatekeeper
> > functioning
> > correctly behind an iptables firewall for possibly this reason.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > p.s.
> > Btw, I tried emailing you about this but it was bounced
> > saying that your
> > MTA rejected my email saying my site was banned because of unsolicited
> > email. I can assure you that there has never been one single spam
> > emanating from my site ever. And if you're banning my ISP - Comcast -
> > you've just banned the majority of broadband users in the US.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-19 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-19 2:21 h.323 compatibility George Vieira
2003-11-19 2:48 ` Marc Williams [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-19 2:12 Marc Williams
2003-11-19 12:33 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1069210128.9755.93.camel@fred.williams.etc \
--to=marcw@onlymooo.com \
--cc=georgev@citadelcomputer.com.au \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox