From: Eddahbi Karim <installation_fault_association@yahoo.fr>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: UDP connections and Conntrack...
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 17:23:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1073492589.9732.16.camel@gamux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0401071254170.18324-100000@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Le mer 07/01/2004 à 12:57, Jozsef Kadlecsik a écrit :
> On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Eddahbi Karim wrote:
>
> > The connection state change at the nat table of the PREROUTING chain and
> > at the nat table of the OUTPUT chain.
>
> False. Check the source code.
After checking the source code, I can see that the two principals hooks
are on these chain.
/* Connection tracking may drop packets, but never alters them, so
make it the first hook. */
static struct nf_hook_ops ip_conntrack_in_ops = {
.hook = ip_conntrack_in,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.pf = PF_INET,
.hooknum = NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING,
.priority = NF_IP_PRI_CONNTRACK,
};
static struct nf_hook_ops ip_conntrack_local_out_ops = {
.hook = ip_conntrack_local,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.pf = PF_INET,
.hooknum = NF_IP_LOCAL_OUT,
.priority = NF_IP_PRI_CONNTRACK,
};
Now, I can't really bet these hooks are on the nat table but conntrack
and nat are very related.
I get the information here :
http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/chunkyhtml/statemachine.html
There's another explanation here :
http://www.sns.ias.edu/~jns/security/iptables/iptables_conntrack.html
If I'm wrong, I want to have a proof...
>
> > Btw Iptables for IPv6 doesn't have any conntrack for the moment ;-).
>
> There is an experimental code which you can find in the mailing list
> archives. It's not in p-o-m yet.
>
Ok thanks :),
--
--
Eddahbi Karim
Phone :
(33) (0)6 61 30 57 77
France
next parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-07 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0401071254170.18324-100000@blackhole.kfki.hu>
2004-01-07 16:23 ` Eddahbi Karim [this message]
2004-01-08 7:22 ` UDP connections and Conntrack Jozsef Kadlecsik
2004-01-09 7:09 ` Eddahbi Karim
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0401071011330.18324-100000@blackhole.kfki.hu>
2004-01-07 13:33 ` Eddahbi Karim
2004-01-03 5:04 Eddahbi Karim
2004-01-05 12:33 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2004-01-06 12:35 ` Eddahbi Karim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1073492589.9732.16.camel@gamux \
--to=installation_fault_association@yahoo.fr \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox