From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexis Subject: Re: IPTables, Linksys BEFSR41 and PCAnywhere Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:52:06 -0300 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1074192725.1572.26.camel@pepelui.baicom> References: <000a01c3db92$465416d0$0f00a8c0@tandem> <1074190723.1570.10.camel@pepelui.baicom> <000401c3db95$9d0a8bf0$0f00a8c0@tandem> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <000401c3db95$9d0a8bf0$0f00a8c0@tandem> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Netfilter i have a lot of customers with linksys devices and the port fowarding works fine. i dont know why they said that linksys will not work. On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 15:30, A. Clausen wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexis" > To: > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 10:18 > Subject: Re: IPTables, Linksys BEFSR41 and PCAnywhere > > > > youre right, just dont forget that pc anywhere uses 2 ports, that i > > think they are 5631 and 5631 tcp > > > > the linksys is with nat enabled? (its just to know, forwarding the ports > > is enough to work) > > That's good to hear. The problem is that it was another company that > administrates their network and some specialized software, and he's > insisting that the Linksys won't do this, when I've seen D-links and > Livingstons work quite well. I did research, and PCAnywhere works fine > through NAT networks, and I thought the claim pretty dubious, but sometimes > dubious claims are right. -- Alexis