Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Frischknecht <peter@empoweringsolutions.com>
To: Netfilter Mailing List <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: IMQ Replacement
Date: 17 Jan 2004 10:15:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1074352525.4761.1389.camel@peterlaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311131244400.13900@fhynpb.envafyvqr.arg>

I have been using IMQ with great success for the last few months.  The
particular network where this is used has 400+ nodes, and IMQ performs
flawlessly.

As anyone who uses IMQ will tell you, the only alternatives are:
1 - Install another router, just to perform NAT
2 - Install 2 additional NICs in the Linux gateway with a Xover cable
between them

Is there another piece of software that performs the job of IMQ?
It is great being able to shape traffic AND masquerade packets in one
box.  How else can it be done?

We shape traffic individually for each client.  Generic traffic shapping
rules that regulate the entire pipe would not work for us.

The fact that IMQ is unmaintained is nerve wrecking.  It is difficult
enough to install the thing with the sources and documentation
available.  It will only become more difficult as the kernel evolves and
we move to 2.6.x.

I don't think I have the knowledge to mainatin the source code.  But I
believe in the concept so much that I might just take up the code
maintenance.  Hoepefully some other folks will join in.  Maybe we can
convince enough folks to incorporate it into 2.6.x.

Any help, comments or even flames will be appreciated.  It is time for a
solution to this problem.

Peter


  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-17 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-12 15:56 linux-2.4.22, iptables-1.2.9, imq Josh Howlett
2003-11-13 12:45 ` Vigil
2004-01-17 15:15   ` Peter Frischknecht [this message]
2004-01-19 13:33     ` IMQ Replacement Andre Correa
2004-01-20  1:26       ` Rio Martin
2004-01-20 10:28       ` Remus
2004-01-20 22:04         ` Alex Satrapa
2004-01-20 11:05       ` Krystian
2004-01-21 14:52         ` Andre Correa
2004-01-26 12:16           ` Andre Correa
2004-01-26 14:42             ` Sven Schuster
2004-01-26 15:50               ` Andy Furniss
2004-01-27  0:17                 ` Andy Furniss
2004-01-27  8:24                   ` Andy Furniss
2004-01-27  8:13             ` Remus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1074352525.4761.1389.camel@peterlaptop \
    --to=peter@empoweringsolutions.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox