From: Internet Protocol version Six <inet6@mail.be>
To: netfilter@newkirk.us
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 Router and NAT/connection tracking
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 02:09:07 +0200 (GMT+02:00) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1074720319.1055981347734.JavaMail.Administrator@pumbaa> (raw)
I'm connected via IPv6-in-IPv4 and I have a /48 assigned to this
box, and I want the box to act as a router for my machines which
it's doing nicely, only the conntrack thing is annoying the hell
outta me ;) Will that solve it (ACCEPTING in both directions)?
And so what you are saying is that I should do this?:
iptables -I INPUT -p 41 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I OUTPUT -p 41 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I PREROUTING -p 41 -j ACCEPT -> not sure about this one
or am I wrong/forgetting something? :)
Thanks for your help, greatly appreciated
> ----------------------------------------
> From: Joel Newkirk <netfilter@newkirk.us>
> Sent: Thu Jun 19 00:28:57 GMT+02:00 2003
> To: Internet Protocol version Six <inet6@mail.be>
> Subject: Re: IPv6 Router and NAT/connection tracking
>
>
> On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 17:05, Internet Protocol version Six wrote:
> > Hello all, I have a box that's configured as a firewall
> > and router for IPv6, which is doing it's job fine, well,
> > fine.., IPv6 connections keep timing out, they work for
> > a second or 30 and then it timesout -> connections,
> > ping6, traceroutes, ... from the Internet to the IPv6
> > address behind the router don't work anymore. Also if I
> > do a ping6 or make a connection to a remote IPv6 host
> > on the Internet it doesn't work, however if I ping6 the
> > router from the network, everything works again...for
> > about 30 seconds again, and then the problem begins
> > again...
> >
> > I was told that this is caused by NAT/connection
> > tracking. Is there *any* solution to this? This is
> > really annoying as I *need* NAT, but also want to give
> > IPv6 connectivity to other machines on the LAN.
>
> Are you directly connected to an IPv6 router, or are you
> connecting via an ipv6_over_ipv4 tunnel of some sort?
>
> If you are direct, then I think all you need to do is work
> with ip6tables. (not sure, not done this)
>
> If you are using a tunnel, then that tunnel will either be
> using a specific protocol or port number, which you could
> explicitly ACCEPT in all directions to avoid conntrack
> interference. For example, tspc (freenet6.net) uses
> TCP 4343 to talk to the server to create the tunnel, and
> the tunnel itself is protocol 41.
>
> j
>
>
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------
Mail.be, WebMail and Virtual Office
http://www.mail.be
next reply other threads:[~2003-06-19 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-19 0:09 Internet Protocol version Six [this message]
2003-06-20 6:24 ` IPv6 Router and NAT/connection tracking Joel Newkirk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-20 22:27 Internet Protocol version Six
2003-06-18 21:05 Internet Protocol version Six
2003-06-18 22:28 ` Joel Newkirk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1074720319.1055981347734.JavaMail.Administrator@pumbaa \
--to=inet6@mail.be \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter@newkirk.us \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox