From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ray Leach Subject: Re: Ping and traceroute denied? Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:30:35 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1077096635.2333.92.camel@raylinux.internal> References: <40332D1F.5010806@epost.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-w9dF1oAAKm7CVoxssu7h" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <40332D1F.5010806@epost.de> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Netfilter Mailing List --=-w9dF1oAAKm7CVoxssu7h Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 11:15, Nicole Haehnel wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I added this rules (with fwbuilder): >=20 > $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -p icmp -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT > $IPTABLES -A OUTPUT -p icmp -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT > $IPTABLES -A INPUT -p icmp -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT >=20 >=20 > Why was ping from an interface of my firewall-host denied? > Traceroute too. >=20 When the return packets come back, their state is not NEW, probably RELATED. > What rule shall I add? >=20 $IPTABLES -A INPUT -p icmp -m state --state NEW,RELATED -j ACCEPT > Thanks! >=20 > Nicole --=20 -- Raymond Leach Network Support Specialist http://www.knowledgefactory.co.za "lynx -source http://www.rchq.co.za/raymondl.asc | gpg --import" Key fingerprint =3D 7209 A695 9EE0 E971 A9AD 00EE 8757 EE47 F06F FB28 -- --=-w9dF1oAAKm7CVoxssu7h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAMzC7h1fuR/Bv+ygRAotrAKCrj8BgmHKOOYK4Bdy2os6/jXYAXgCaAxNF aBqXk8qxUU7RWBfp6F1Rp7Y= =7kPu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-w9dF1oAAKm7CVoxssu7h--