From: Ray Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
To: Netfilter Mailing List <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: SV: Ports opened without request
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:09:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1077800995.2445.31.camel@raylinux.internal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <403DE584.7020704@stupar.homelinux.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3955 bytes --]
Your default policy on the FORWARD chain is accept.
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 14:24, Sasa Stupar wrote:
> I have scanned from another machine. Yes, I allow ICMP packets. I have
> droped them and rescanned the machine but still the same issue.
> My current ruleset is:
> ---------------------
> # Generated by webmin
> *filter
> :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> :INPUT DROP [0:0]
> # Loopback
> -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT
> # Allow self access by loopback interface
> -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
> # Accept established connections
> -A INPUT -m state -i eth0 --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp ! --tcp-option 2 -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset
> # FTP
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 21 -j ACCEPT
> # Telnet
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 23 -j ACCEPT
> # SMTP
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT
> # NTP
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 37 -j ACCEPT
> # DNS
> -A INPUT -p udp -m udp -s 192.168.10.111 -d 0/0 --sport 53 -j ACCEPT
> # HTTP
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT --syn
> # POP3
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 110 -j ACCEPT
> # Samba
> -A INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 137 -j ACCEPT
> # Samba
> -A INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 138 -j ACCEPT
> # Samba
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 139 -j ACCEPT --syn
> # HTTPS
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT
> # SMTP-SSL
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 465 -j ACCEPT
> # POP3-SSL
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 995 -j ACCEPT
> # Squid Proxy
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 3128 -j ACCEPT
> # Xmail CtrlClnt
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 6017 -j ACCEPT
> # XQM agent
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8888 -j ACCEPT
> # Webmin
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 10000 -j ACCEPT
> # Drop all other connection attempts
> -A INPUT -j DROP
> COMMIT
> # Generated by webmin
> *mangle
> :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
> :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
> :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> COMMIT
> # Completed
> # Generated by webmin
> *nat
> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
> :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
> COMMIT
> # Completed
> ------------------------
>
> As you can see I have made this rules with webmin.
> Any hints what is wrong here? BTW I am very very new at firewall.
>
> Sasa
>
>
> Sven-Ake Larsson pravi:
>
> >How did you make scan, from the machine itself or from another machine on
> >the outside? Some rulesets doesn't really work when you are at the same
> >machine.
> >Do you allow any ICMP packets? If so, try to drop them too and scan the
> >machine again.
> >What is your current ruleset? It helps a lot if you can add it to the list.
> >
> >I believe you'll have the masters answers soon... ;-)
> >
> >Regards,
> >S
> >
> >-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> >Fran: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
> >[mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org]För Sasa Stupar
> >Skickat: den 25 februari 2004 18:01
> >Till: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> >Ämne: Ports opened without request
> >
> >
> >Hi!
> >
> >I have linux RH8 with kernel 2.4.20-28.8, iptables v1.2.8. I have setup
> >a firewall with some tcp ports opened (21,25,80,110,443) for servers.
> >Then I have ran a port scan and scanned all 65535 tcp and udp ports. I
> >was suprised that 3 ports were opened even if I didn't opened them in
> >the configuration. These ports are tcp 389,1002 and 1720.
> >I have tried to block them manually by entering a drop command for these
> >three ports but no success-they are still open.
> >What am I missing here? Is this some problem with iptables?
> >
> >Sasa
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
--
--
Raymond Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
Network Support Specialist
http://www.knowledgefactory.co.za
"lynx -source http://www.rchq.co.za/raymondl.asc | gpg --import"
Key fingerprint = 7209 A695 9EE0 E971 A9AD 00EE 8757 EE47 F06F FB28
--
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-26 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 17:01 Ports opened without request Sasa Stupar
2004-02-25 19:24 ` SV: " Sven-Ake Larsson
2004-02-26 12:24 ` Sasa Stupar
2004-02-26 13:09 ` Ray Leach [this message]
2004-02-26 13:48 ` Sasa Stupar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-26 15:53 Sven-Åke Larsson
2004-02-26 16:57 ` Sasa Stupar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1077800995.2445.31.camel@raylinux.internal \
--to=raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox