From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexis Subject: Re: Windows Broadcast Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 11:26:53 -0300 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1078151213.1702.56.camel@pepelui.baicom> References: <200403011612.26193.eric@regit.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200403011612.26193.eric@regit.org> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="macroman" To: Eric Leblond Cc: Netfilter i think that a good aproach could be to use an internal dns in order to resolve the name and then you could use netbios over tcp to get routed to the other lan. A broadcast will not pass the router. On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 11:12, Eric Leblond wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > >As a broadcast packet is a packet internal to a network, it don't have > >to go through a router, so it will go on INPUT chain. >=20 > If I have two networks with windows machines without wins server, what I = can=20 > do with iptables to permit broadcats packets for netbios name resolve. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) >=20 > iQEVAwUBQENEx+Xb9tKkwh23AQJ86QgAlQ8OV0J3nhKeC+O8fMArDmnR4qAlCoPa > ZkQ4d4Ly0uyUcBFu+4ZjqHW4SijXgzFhQcD2gdTdWF9fqo9udS+pa5iPR9p8bkgR > fhpWXQU5N+H7RO0IxV6GhPt84v8+J8BHwS1MgdslVXGdFgkPSjZlQ7QSEHcgYJHQ > 2UMNuDtBJaHJncXO17zE7++MQnUfExak3PwaTkIYk0sSkKL+nqA2W+8qDYN/5K1A > VumPUgKRuuX2OQJeD8XGlqy8ltLG99ztSPgyCVhJjUGf8Vmqe9q6lle65tPuWPtK > aULvEVguHQstJ9WIjV9VBtPXj6vV+ScG7pniq/NRyS4d4vpOMsYAtA=3D=3D > =3DrHkP > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=20 Tus problemas no se pueden resolver en el mismo nivel mental que ten=C3=ADas cuando los creaste.=20 Albert Einstein