Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John A. Sullivan III" <john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com>
To: Mark Alzino <tirixil@hotmail.com>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: How to change DNS with iptables rules ?
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 04:11:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1085645336.10065.7.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY16-F67ZBNCogiwHs000430ac@hotmail.com>

On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 09:23, Mark Alzino wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have two DNS server : one at 10.0.0.254 and one at 192.168.10.254.
> I just want to dynamically change the DNS for a user (at 10.0.0.1 for 
> example), but there is a time for the iptables rules to be activate.
> Here is more explanation.
> 
> 
> I use two DNS servers (bind 9), in the same host, with two interfaces. Each 
> one ONLY listens on one interface (So, must not answer to a request related 
> to an other one !).
> 
> At the begining, the user has the 10.0.0.254 server. Then I add rules in 
> order to change the DNS for 192.168.10.254.
> I use this the following rules :
> iptables -A PREROUTING -s 10.0.0.1 -d 10.0.0.254 -t nat -p UDP --dport 53 -j 
> DNAT --to-destination 192.168.10.254
> iptables -A PREROUTING -s 10.0.0.1 -d 10.0.0.254 -t nat -p UDP --sport 53 -j 
> DNAT --to-destination 192.168.10.254
> 
> ** BUT **  : during a period (between 0 and 3 minutes), the user is ALWAYS 
> CONNECTED TO the
> 10.0.0.254 server !!
> In others words, I always have what I should have, but I have to wait for a 
> minute to have this...
> 
> How it is possible ??
> 
> 
> - Are the rules rights ??
> - Is there really a time for the PREROUTING target to be activate (Is that 
> it seem to be, but generally speaking rules are immediate...) ?
> - DNS (bind) listen at the begining only on one interface and listen on all 
> interface if it recognize a user he has served ? (!!!)
> - Anyone has the answer ? :-)
<snip>
How are you determining which DNS the user is using? Is it by seeing
which address it uses for a previously used query? Could it be that the
client is caching a previous DNS response? If you put a protocol
analyzer on the wire, is the client actually making a DNS request when
you think it is or is it not putting a DNS packet on the wire at all, in
other words, using some cached information? Hope this helps - John
-- 
John A. Sullivan III
Chief Technology Officer
Nexus Management
+1 207-985-7880
john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com
---
If you are interested in helping to develop a GPL enterprise class
VPN/Firewall/Security device management console, please visit
http://iscs.sourceforge.net 



  reply	other threads:[~2004-05-27  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-25 13:23 How to change DNS with iptables rules ? Mark Alzino
2004-05-27  8:11 ` John A. Sullivan III [this message]
2004-05-27 22:26 ` Jorge Davila

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1085645336.10065.7.camel@localhost \
    --to=john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=tirixil@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox