From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: skip other iptables marking if packet is already marked Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 13:56:46 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1086004606.9100.15.camel@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> References: <020701c446e0$44e95ee0$0100a8c0@newlife> <1085991395.26732.12.camel@anduril.intranet.cartel-securite.net> <1085996196.9107.5.camel@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> <1086004005.26732.14.camel@anduril.intranet.cartel-securite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1086004005.26732.14.camel@anduril.intranet.cartel-securite.net> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Cedric Blancher Cc: Ming-Ching Tiew , netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Mon, 2004-05-31 at 13:46, Cedric Blancher wrote: > > Really? No mark and mark 0 are different? > > Well, I though. I just check and I was wrong. Sorry, my fault. No worries; it gave me an opportunity to promote the "CONNMARK restore-mark creates conntrack entry?" thread, on which I'm pretty desperate for feedback. Oops, I did it again! Britney Spears would be proud. ;-) Ciao, Sheldon.