From: ken scott <kscott9@triad.rr.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Cc: Dimitar Katerinski <train@bofh.bg>
Subject: Re: Transparent proxy single machine question
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 20:52:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1088297542.4717.29.camel@Kenslinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40DDFBD1.2090700@bofh.bg>
On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 18:42, Dimitar Katerinski wrote:
> Hello Ken,
>
> Ah just know I understand that this is a workstation with some users,
> and squid and DG running ot this machine. Okay, I did some tests and
> came up with a solution ;-)
> You can't redirect packets that origin from the machine itself, to some
> other local port (as far as i know). Maybe you can play with
> CONFIG_IP_NF_NAT_LOCAL option in the kernel, but as I understand it, it
> lets you to use destination NAT on connections originating from local
> processes on the nat box itself, but that is now we are looking for. So
> here is what you can do:
>
> 1. Leave the proxy setting as is in the browser properties (127.0.0.1:8181)
> 2. Allow outgoing requests to port 80 only for the UID that squid is
> running under.
> iptables -A OUTPUT -m owner ! --uid squid -p tcp --dport 80 -j DROP
> This rule can be more flexible, but I live this to you, I hope you get
> the idea.
> 3. And finally test, whether you can make requests as user with and
> without proxy set in the browser.
>
Dimitar,
Success!! (at least mostly.) Thanks greatly for your assistance.
I used WEBMIN firewall module to build the following rule:
-A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -m owner ! --uid-owner squid -j
DROP
case 1- User requests (with browser set to no proxy) time out after
about a minute. [Desired outcome except timeout takes a long time]
case 2- User requests (with browser proxy set to the Dansguardian 8181
port) work fine. [Desired outcome]
case 3- User requests (with browser proxy set to the Squid 3128 port)
also work fine. [Not desired since webfiltering is bypassed]
So three things remain
1) Newbie question - How do I edit/change directly the iptable rules
without requiring webmin? (I can print them out with the iptables-save
command)
2) Can I get the request reject/timeout to occur more quickly?
3) Can I close the loop hole of someone pointing their browser to the
squid port (rather than the dg port)?
Thanks again!!
Ken
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-27 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-26 21:24 Transparent proxy single machine question ken scott
2004-06-26 21:51 ` Dimitar Katerinski
2004-06-26 22:09 ` ken scott
2004-06-26 22:42 ` Dimitar Katerinski
2004-06-27 0:52 ` ken scott [this message]
2004-06-27 1:16 ` Dimitar Katerinski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-26 21:14 ken scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1088297542.4717.29.camel@Kenslinux \
--to=kscott9@triad.rr.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=train@bofh.bg \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox