From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Torsten Luettgert Subject: RE: A simple question Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:39:44 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1092904784.9327.11.camel@scaramouche> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Don, 2004-08-19 at 06:18, Mark E. Donaldson wrote: > As you might expect, it is quite easy to DOS the firewall itself > when OUTPUT is set to DROP. And that is not a real good idea. Please elaborate - why is it easy to DOS the firewall if the output policy is DROP? You don't mean icmp/source-quench not getting delivered or something? > However, having said that, close scrutiny must be paid to what you > allow out of the firewall and the necessary rules must be in place. ...which is why I personally use DROP as default policy for all chains and explicitly allow everything I think necessary :-) The only exception is in the mangle table, where I use ACCEPT policies and just filter out the obvious spoofs, unclean frames etc. Greetings, Torsten